Friday, February 20, 2009

Obama? Nothing's Changed--

New York Post apologizes for, yet still defends, chimp cartoon

  • Story Highlights
  • NEW: Sharpton: "Various groups" would respond at 5 p.m. at Post headquarters
  • New York Post apologizes on Web site; blasts some "opportunist" detractors
  • Paper said cartoon was meant to mock what an "ineptly written" stimulus bill
  • Paper also said "no apology is due" to those who want payback for the past
  • Next Article in U.S. »
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font

NEW YORK (CNN) -- A day after publishing a cartoon that drew fire from critics who said it evoked historically racist images, the New York Post apologized in a statement on its Web site -- even as it defended its action and blasted some detractors.

A New York Post cartoon has sparked a debate over race and cartooning this week.

A New York Post cartoon has sparked a debate over race and cartooning this week.

Many of those critical of the cartoon said it appeared to compare President Barack Obama to a chimpanzee in a commentary on his recently approved economic stimulus package.

"Wednesday's Page Six cartoon -- caricaturing Monday's police shooting of a chimpanzee in Connecticut -- has created considerable controversy," the paper said about the drawing, which shows two police officers standing over the body of a chimpanzee they just shot.

The drawing is a reference to the mauling of a woman by a pet chimpanzee, which was then killed by police. In the cartoon, one of the officers tells the other, "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill."

The Post said the cartoon was meant to mock what it called an "ineptly written" stimulus bill.

"But it has been taken as something else -- as a depiction of President Obama, as a thinly veiled expression of racism," reads the statement. "This most certainly was not its intent; to those who were offended by the image, we apologize."

But the statement immediately swerves to fire back at some of the image's critics.

"However, there are some in the media and in public life who have had differences with The Post in the past -- and they see the incident as an opportunity for payback," the statement says. "To them, no apology is due. Sometimes a cartoon is just a cartoon -- even as the opportunists seek to make it something else."

Several African-American leaders, including the Rev. Al Sharpton, attacked the image, which was drawn by artist Sean Delonas.

Sharpton said Thursday he and the leaders of "various groups" would respond at 5 p.m. Friday outside The Post's offices in midtown Manhattan.

"Though we think it is the right thing for them to apologize to those they offended," the statement appeared to blame those who raised the issue "rather than take responsibility for what they did," Sharpton said.

He accused the newspaper of having "belatedly come with a conditional statement after people began mobilizing and preparing to challenge the waiver of News Corp in the city where they own several television stations and newspapers."

Delonas has made Sharpton the butt of previous cartoons in The Post.

In a brief phone interview with CNN, Delonas called the controversy "absolutely friggin' ridiculous."

"Do you really think I'm saying Obama should be shot? I didn't see that in the cartoon," Delonas told CNN.

"It's about the economic stimulus bill," he added.

Col Allan, the Post's editor-in-chief, said Wednesday that the cartoon "is a clear parody of a current news event."

"It broadly mocks Washington's efforts to revive the economy. Again, Al Sharpton reveals himself as nothing more than a publicity opportunist," Allan said in a written statement.

But Sharpton was not alone in his criticism. Barbara Ciara, president of the National Association of Black Journalists, said The Post showed a "serious lapse in judgment" by running the cartoon.

"To think that the cartoonist and the responsible editors at the paper did not see the racist overtones of the finished product should insult their intelligence," Ciara said in a written statement. "Instead, they celebrate their own lack of perspective and criticize those who call it what it is: tone deaf at best, overtly racist at worst."

"Comparing President Obama and his effort to revive the economy in a manner that depicts violence and racist inferences is unacceptable," said National Urban League President Marc Morial in a statement issued Wednesday.

The nearly $800 billion stimulus package was the top priority for Obama, the first black U.S. president, who signed it Tuesday.

In an open letter to The Post, musician John Legend criticized the newspaper and called on New Yorkers not to buy it, or talk to its reporters or buy its advertising space.

Addressing the newspaper's editors, Legend wrote, "Did it occur to you that our president has been receiving death threats since early in his candidacy? Did it occur to you that blacks have historically been compared to various apes as a way of racist insult and mockery? Did you intend to invoke these painful themes when you printed the cartoon?

"If that's not what you intended, then it was stupid and willfully ignorant of you not to connect these easily connectable dots. If it is what you intended, then you obviously wanted to be grossly provocative, racist and offensive."

Either way, Legend said, the fact that the cartoon was printed "is truly reprehensible."

Thursday, February 19, 2009

"voluntarily socially segregated."

By Terry Frieden
CNN
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In a blunt assessment of race relations in the United States, Attorney General Eric Holder Wednesday called the American people "essentially a nation of cowards" in failing to openly discuss the issue of race.

Eric Holder spoke to an overflowing crowd for Black History Month at the Justice Department Wednesday.

Eric Holder spoke to an overflowing crowd for Black History Month at the Justice Department Wednesday.

 In his first major speech since being confirmed, the nation's first black attorney general told an overflow crowd celebrating Black History Month at the Justice Department the nation remains "voluntarily socially segregated."

"Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards," Holder declared.

Holder urged Americans of all races to use Black History Month as a time to have a forthright national conversation between blacks and whites to discuss aspects of race which are ignored because they are uncomfortable.

The attorney general said employees across the country "have done a pretty good job in melding the races in the workplace," but he noted that "certain subjects are off limits and that to explore them risks at best embarrassment and at worst the questioning of one's character." "On Saturdays and Sundays, America in the year 2009 does not, in some ways, differ significantly from the country that existed some 50 years ago. This is truly sad," Holder said.

Following his address, Holder declined to say whether his unexpectedly stern message would be translated into policy.

"It's a question of being honest with ourselves and racial issues that divide us," Holder told reporters in a hastily arranged news conference. "It's not easy to talk about it. We have to have the guts to be honest with each other, accept criticism, accept new proposals."

The nation's top law enforcement official vowed to "revitalize the Civil Rights Division" at the Justice Department but offered no specifics.

In a reference to the highly divisive issue of affirmative action, Holder said there can be "very legitimate debate about the question of affirmative action. This debate can and should be nuanced, principled and spirited." The attorney general criticized past public debates on the issue as "too often simplistic and left to those on the extremes who are not hesitant to use these issues to advance nothing more than their own narrow self-interest."

President Barack Obama has not yet nominated an assistant attorney general to head the Civil Rights Division, which is charged with enforcing the nation's civil rights laws and which helps fashion race-related policy.

advertisement
Allegations of politically motivated hiring in the division and increased emphasis on combating religious discrimination and human trafficking -- rather than concentration on traditional civil rights enforcement -- during the Bush administration caused some dissent in the department.

Holder has promised to bring order to the Civil Rights Division.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Jewish Museum of Tolerance

I fully agree with Rabbi Yoffie.  Legality and ethics are two different sides of a coin.  You can one without the other. But it is difficult to have both at the same time, if at all.  Building a structure to promote tolerance in a world filled to the "brim" with intolerant people and nations, is wonderful.  But not if it means being morally blind. It is the same mistake White Europeans made when believing America was empty and they could do as they wished. They murdered and enslaved my ancestors. Building a Jewish Museum of Tolerance on top of a burial ground would be no different.  Instead of bridging a gap,this museum will create hate and more intolerance.  There is no such thing as a three-sided coin.  As my elders taught me "you cannot have your cake and eat it too"!
I am a Black American-Native American Reform Jew.  I am a convert.  There are those Jews who believe when one converts to Judaism, they close the door to their past.  A nice thought but not reality.  I can not forget my skin color anymore than those who refuse to let me forget it.  I live in a country,state and community in which racism is very much alive.  Unfortunately, it also lives in the Jewish communities as well.  As a child growing up, I was very close to my grandfather. He is the person responsible for me choosing Judaism. My grandparents taught me the importance of respect.  Not only for the living but also the dead.  I was taught not to speak ill of the deceased.  I was also taught where ever they were buried, was "hallowed" ground. I was not to walk on their grave nor do anything that would deface or demean their "resting place". In addition, it was forbidden to "unearth" a person once they are committed into the ground. Note, I used the word "person". Regardless of whether Muslims still consider the graveyard as hallowed or not is not the point.  The fact that "people" rest there is.
As Jews we are to be exemplary.  We are to respect "all" of G*d's creations, both living and dead.  Whether they are Jews, Christians,Muslim,Buddhist etc..How can we expect others to respect our dead, if we do not respect their dead? All construction on this site should be stopped and the graveyard restored to its original state or as best as possible to what it was. A new site for the Jewish Museum of Tolerance should be chosen which is on neutral ground and it be built there.
 
Micaiah ben Malachi
Makedah bat Leah
Minnesota
journeyhome@ll.net